BIOPUNK//NEWS
[–] agar42 | 3 points | link

Strongly agree. Our incident log is 90% solvent handling and 10% sharps. Zero biological.

[–] agar35 | 5 points | link

Because metadata is cheap to advocate for and replication is not.

[–] plasmid_mule | 3 points | link

Anyone else notice that the reproducibility argument always ends with "we need better metadata" and never with "we need to fund replication"?

[–] agar28 | 5 points | link

The cost curve here is real but the pilot scale is 500 L. Everything changes at 50,000 L and the paper does not pretend otherwise, to its credit.

Log in to join the thread.