BIOPUNK//NEWS
  1. Senolytics in humans: reading the phase 2 data honestly (example-longevity-journal.org) Longevity 27 points | open_assay | | 6 comments

Log in to join the thread.

6 comments in thread
[–] blot37 | 6 points | link

Having done the 50k L version: foam control alone eats the margin they are projecting.

[–] ferment47 | 5 points | link

The review actually proposes three. Section 4. They are weak, but they exist.

[–] blot23 | 4 points | link

Counterpoint: undocumented data compounds confusion. The README here is genuinely good, which is why it works.

[–] gel27 | 3 points | link

Started my lab entirely on auction equipment. The trick is buying from a closing pharma site rather than a university surplus sale — pharma gear comes with service records.

[–] micron38 | 3 points | link

Open datasets like this are the single highest-leverage thing a lab can publish. Papers age, data compounds.

[–] curator | 1 point | link

I would like to see the word "intelligence" retired from this entire subfield until someone proposes a falsifiable behavioural test.